This topic has been autolocked for inactivity. If you have something to add, Click Here to request it is re-opened.
#67226 by unknown[32513] at 2005-02-10 13:33:53 (8 years ago) - [Report]
I really don't see any reason to start another new IRC network.
Instead you could keep your userbase on FreeQuest and if you want your own server you could file a request for linking to FreeQuest.
Support freequest
#67244 by unknown[1355] at 2005-02-10 13:47:48 (8 years ago) - [Report]
own IRC!! HELL YES!
#67293 by unknown[15228] at 2005-02-10 14:24:30 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Hell yes! we need it!
#67325 by unknown[23638] at 2005-02-10 14:42:33 (8 years ago) - [Report]
indeed IRC TO THE RESCUE!!!!
#67412 by unknown[17519] at 2005-02-10 15:52:34 (8 years ago) - [Report]
I don't really see the need.
#67435 by unknown[25359] at 2005-02-10 16:09:22 (8 years ago) - [Report]
sorry for being stupid but what is irc? and what is this "freequest".
i voted in the poll as blank cuz i dont know, any care to explain?
#67442 by unknown[17519] at 2005-02-10 16:14:26 (8 years ago) - [Report]
punylich wrote:
sorry for being stupid but what is irc? and what is this "freequest".
i voted in the poll as blank cuz i dont know, any care to explain?
I think you guys should put the power on fixing more slots..
#67483 by Metroid (Power User) at 2005-02-10 16:31:58 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Quote:
What would you say to our own IRC
HELL YES
#67522 by unknown[17187] at 2005-02-10 16:55:04 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Hell yes!
#67567 by unknown[17385] at 2005-02-10 17:30:50 (8 years ago) - [Report]
mace wrote:
the problem being that freequest is netsplit paradise, if you know what i mean
our own IRCD would rawk!
So what's better not reaching a channel entirely, because the only single IRC Server of that network is down or dealing with netsplits, which are in no way a problem for the channels security
#67755 by unknown[2584] at 2005-02-10 19:56:58 (8 years ago) - [Report]
hell yeah...
it's a very good thing but I have no idea how much money it will cost. Or how memory of the server it will use.
If it don't use the server and money is not a problem HELL YEAH!!!
#67758 by naresh (IndianA Vip) at 2005-02-10 19:58:47 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Hell Yeah
#67772 by unknown[20945] at 2005-02-10 20:12:11 (8 years ago) - [Report]
I would have thought there were other more important things to work rather than hosting an irc channel
#68514 by unknown[33482] at 2005-02-11 06:20:46 (8 years ago) - [Report]
My vote : Hell yes
However, I know running IRC is no menial task, though it does not consume all that mutch bandwidth it does take up precuis processing power and time, and freequest, like alot of people say, is afterall a well managed server, even with all the netsplits. I say, yes, sure, an IRC server whould be great, but it should not be priority #1
#68632 by unknown[19990] at 2005-02-11 09:41:39 (8 years ago) - [Report]
I think it's a foolish waste of bandwidth, cpu cycles and time. Freequest is fine, netsplits will always occur on any network you use thats has more then one server.
More importantly, If the tb-servers lose connnectivity, no one would be able to discuss what the problem was because the irc server would be gone as well.
#69200 by unknown[2698] at 2005-02-11 17:23:50 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Better you try to rise the user limit
#69372 by unknown[7015] at 2005-02-11 19:36:02 (8 years ago) - [Report]
yes
This topic has been autolocked for inactivity. If you have something to add, Click Here to request it is re-opened.
(IndianA Vip) at 2005-02-10 19:58:47 (8 years ago) - [
