I don't find it necessary, FreeQuest works fine just like it is. IRC servers cost money right? So use the money for something more useful, like the DOX FTP server !
#66648 by unknown[23] at 2005-02-10 03:51:27 (8 years ago) - [Report]
chucklesjh wrote:
I don't find it necessary, FreeQuest works fine just like it is. IRC servers cost money right? So use the money for something more useful, like the DOX FTP server !
Naw, we could run it from one of our existing servers. No problem there.
#66683 by unknown[902] at 2005-02-10 04:28:06 (8 years ago) - [Report]
I don't really care because I mostly use the forums rather than IRC. However, it makes sense to have our own IRC server, so that TB Admins/Mods are in control. It's also nice to have a little privacy.
mchan065 wrote:
Hell Yes!
hate the freequest /msg nickserv identify crap
I think nick registration is a good thing on any server. See how you like it when someone uses your nick to raise hell in #tb, and you get a ban...
not really, not point in it actually aside for the neat little "torrentbytes" instead of the "freequest"
big whoop
#66731 by unknown[13637] at 2005-02-10 05:07:00 (8 years ago) - [Report]
if you could set it up like oink has it set up that would be even better. i can't even get onto feeequest irc. sumthin about registering and i read the stickyon it,but i ended up giving it up since i could just easily go onto oink's irc.
#66865 by unknown[37] at 2005-02-10 07:52:08 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Freequest is fine for me whats bad with freequest ?
#66958 by unknown[46686] at 2005-02-10 09:48:38 (8 years ago) - [Report]
To set up and run an IRC server is fast and easy And since IRC doesn't consume any bandwith to speek of there is no harm in putting one up Announcers and other fun stuff like pollbots, triviabots and so on just to name a few.
the sky is the limit when it comes to IRC and bots
damn, it's good to be the king
#66973 by Gomezie (Power User) at 2005-02-10 10:01:53 (8 years ago) - [Report]
Definately its only a good thing.. plus you would have more control!
#67020 by unknown[4317] at 2005-02-10 10:56:35 (8 years ago) - [Report]
If I can eat it then yes.
#67024 by unknown[23405] at 2005-02-10 10:59:14 (8 years ago) - [Report]
yeah.
#67041 by unknown[22099] at 2005-02-10 11:05:05 (8 years ago) - [Report]
screw irc, i say use all servers for the site instead
#67089 by unknown[17385] at 2005-02-10 11:41:00 (8 years ago) - [Report]
I don't like the idea, i mean when the servers are down when nforce-network is unreachable - no IRC.
It's much better to go with a "real" distributed IRC network like Freequest.
#67153 by unknown[31217] at 2005-02-10 12:36:48 (8 years ago) - [Report]
smart01705 wrote:
I don't like the idea, i mean when the servers are down when nforce-network is unreachable - no IRC.
It's much better to go with a "real" distributed IRC network like Freequest.
the problem being that freequest is netsplit paradise, if you know what i mean
our own IRCD would rawk!
#67179 by unknown[46969] at 2005-02-10 13:00:40 (8 years ago) - [Report]
pointless
This topic has been autolocked for inactivity. If you have something to add, Click Here to request it is re-opened.
Hell yes!
(Power User) at 2005-02-10 03:49:50 (8 years ago) - [
!
whats bad with freequest ?
(Power User) at 2005-02-10 10:01:53 (8 years ago) - [
(Power User) at 2005-02-10 11:18:02 (8 years ago) - [
