Bill due in 5 days
 0%
Donate
Welcome, diggwolf375 [logout]   DL: 457.59 MB  UL: 0.00 kB  Ratio:0.000
Inbox 1 (0)   Sentbox 0   Bookmarks   Friends

Poll discussing > How do you feel after bitbucket has...

1 2 3 4
<< Prev      Next >>

#264368 by unknown[15228] at 2005-06-25 01:54:44 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it. 

#264380 by unknown[5234] at 2005-06-25 02:04:47 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Gollum wrote:

If it helps the site, I'm all for it. 

Yea yea yea :cool:

#264387 by mprandyDonor (Power User) at 2005-06-25 02:11:37 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Actually, what's bitbucket?

OMG, it's disabled and I haven't had a chance to use them before :slap:

Damn, :wall:

#264417 by denise119Donor (Ms.OneOneNine) at 2005-06-25 02:40:01 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I did use it host my avatar, but only because it was easily available and i was too lazy to open imageshack in a new tab.

But if it helps the sites bandwidth issues then it has to be a good thing that its gone/disabled :-)

#264448 by unknown[778] at 2005-06-25 03:27:05 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.  I don't use it, so it's no loss for me, but I can understand why some people might not like it.

#264459 by DSLFreak (Power User) at 2005-06-25 03:48:02 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I use my own webspace, so if it helps the site, im all for it.

#264543 by unknown[58263] at 2005-06-25 07:47:09 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I thought bitbucket was VERY convenient for a quick upload. Sites like photobucket always bitch at me when you have too many pictures. I had about 6-7 high(er) resolution pictues, like 1024x768 or less, and it told me I went over bandwidth and some shit like that. I didn't rely on bitbucket for all my pics, but like I said, if you wanted to upload a pic really quick for a certain thread or conversation, it was really convenient.

#264609 by unknown[35211] at 2005-06-25 10:42:44 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

There are enough other places to host your image so I don't see a problem with it. Even if one of the free hosts don't have enough bandwith you should have some webspace from your internet provider you can use they usualy don't complain about bandwith unless you really go out of line.

#264637 by unknown[6706] at 2005-06-25 11:04:32 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I use my own webspaces so its all good

#264673 by unknown[15369] at 2005-06-25 11:39:29 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Blade2k wrote:

There are enough other places to host your image so I don't see a problem with it. Even if one of the free hosts don't have enough bandwith you should have some webspace from your internet provider you can use they usualy don't complain about bandwith unless you really go out of line.

I couldnt agree with u more...and if it helps site's speed, then let's go on this way...

#264761 by billythefish (User) at 2005-06-25 13:00:24 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

#264860 by unknown[306] at 2005-06-25 15:01:27 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

#264878 by unknown[3858] at 2005-06-25 15:13:58 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.   

#264910 by unknown[6254] at 2005-06-25 16:02:33 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.    :-)

It was easy to change the host.

#264952 by unknown[95457] at 2005-06-25 16:53:52 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

It doesn't affect me, so I don't care.

#265124 by unknown[72311] at 2005-06-25 19:25:36 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Little sad 

#265192 by unknown[23] at 2005-06-25 20:36:14 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Have my own server so I don't care.

#265214 by unknown[27226] at 2005-06-25 20:49:18 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Hmm, im sorry for the guys who used bitbucket...

#265216 by fash (Power User) at 2005-06-25 20:52:39 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Never used it, so i wont miss it. Godd idea to get rid if it will help the site stay open.

#265372 by fr3aKyDonor (Power User) at 2005-06-25 23:11:05 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

swebarb wrote:

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

#265393 by jameswhe03 (Worldly) at 2005-06-25 23:25:34 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

sensory wrote:

Have my own server so I don't care.

  ewww, smarty pants!

i didnt use it anyways! so i put, 'if it helps the site..'

#265477 by unknown[3846] at 2005-06-26 00:17:48 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I'm not happy about that decision. That was my first impression about this but on second thoughts: If it helps the site, it should be done. :-) There are many other places where you can host your images. So you could say I changed my mind!

#265539 by unknown[5817] at 2005-06-26 01:14:21 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I miss it really much. Looking on older posts in the forums and many (before) cool profiles is just rubbish now. I would hope you would find some other way to save bandwith, but this is probably the most bandwith-stealing resource...

#265622 by unknown[1610] at 2005-06-26 02:59:28 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

I used bitbucket before but it's not like it's the only way to host an image, if it helps the site than im all for it

#265901 by unknown[38695] at 2005-06-26 11:42:49 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

WetWillie wrote:

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

I used bitbucket before but it's not like it's the only way to host an image, if it helps the site than im all for it

:yes: agree

1 2 3 4
<< Prev      Next >>

This topic is locked; no new posts are allowed.

Quick jump: