Bill due in 5 days
 0%
Donate
Welcome, diggwolf375 [logout]   DL: 457.59 MB  UL: 0.00 kB  Ratio:0.000
Inbox 1 (0)   Sentbox 0   Bookmarks   Friends

Poll discussing > How do you feel after bitbucket has...

1 2 3 4
<< Prev      Next >>

#263944 by BaByLoVeDonor (~*~ MeSmErIzE ~*~ ) at 2005-06-24 20:31:39 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

How do you feel after bitbucket has closed?

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.     
It doesn't affect me, so I don't care.     
I already miss it.     
I'm not happy about that decision.     

Last edited by BaByLoVe at 2005-06-24 20:32:13

#263965 by unknown[28310] at 2005-06-24 20:48:32 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Yeah I might get first reply!!!

I don't care, I've never used it. If I do need pic hosting I'll just go to ImageShack

#263968 by unknown[6634] at 2005-06-24 20:51:54 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

biged wrote:

I don't care, I've never used it. If I do need pic hosting I'll just go to ImageShack

same here

#263971 by unknown[809] at 2005-06-24 20:55:16 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

#263973 by Nilmopv (Power User) at 2005-06-24 20:56:48 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it. 

#263998 by VeryBadGuyDonor (Mad Ultra Mod) at 2005-06-24 21:13:45 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site with bandwidth and speed I am happy it is gone..never used it..there are plenty of good image servers out there that it was never really necessary IMO

#264015 by bloupx (First Line Support) at 2005-06-24 21:22:24 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

it was a useless feature as previously said there's many places you can get your picture hosted on for free.

-> no big loss.

#264018 by hanekDonor (Ralph Wolf) at 2005-06-24 21:25:53 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

"If it helps the site, I'm all for it."

Just use another hosting, there are many to choose from.

#264028 by Hamsteren (Power User) at 2005-06-24 21:30:38 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

Whatever helps the site stay up

#264030 by tkmn (Power User) at 2005-06-24 21:30:55 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Well, I liked it.

I'd like to think my 5543 byte avatar didn't cause to much traffic... :-/

[edit]

<--- Hey, it's still here! :-)

Last edited by tkmn at 2005-06-24 21:31:59

#264032 by hanekDonor (Ralph Wolf) at 2005-06-24 21:33:12 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

tkmn wrote:

<--- Hey, it's still here! :-)

not here, try ctrl+f5

#264058 by unknown[18471] at 2005-06-24 21:55:58 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Sux :-/ the most pics in my profile are gone !!!

#264082 by unknown[91604] at 2005-06-24 22:11:53 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

I do not care. I use imageshack.us.
Thank you for this wonderful tracker.
Love it.

#264087 by chrisDonor (Power User) at 2005-06-24 22:13:06 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Blank vote, as there wasn't an 'I don't care' option :smirk:

#264096 by xosemp (VIP) at 2005-06-24 22:16:04 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

chris wrote:

Blank vote, as there wasn't an 'I don't care' option :smirk:

What about option 2?

BTW, even now that it's gone I haven't noticed any improvement on my side... But I hope it helps to TBytes servers anyway.

#264099 by unknown[78264] at 2005-06-24 22:17:29 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

never used it..theres several other free alternatives so i voted 'dont care'

#264103 by chrisDonor (Power User) at 2005-06-24 22:19:13 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

xosemp wrote:

chris wrote:

Blank vote, as there wasn't an 'I don't care' option :smirk:

What about option 2?

It did affect me, but it dosn't bother me heh

#264119 by unknown[80754] at 2005-06-24 22:27:01 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.


ppl can allways get a new image host... there is plenty around!

#264170 by nareshDonor (IndianA Vip) at 2005-06-24 23:01:29 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it

#264184 by unknown[95169] at 2005-06-24 23:13:56 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Whatever it takes to keep the site up, and as people have already commented, it is/was not (strictly speaking) a necessary service, especially when there are other (and bigger) providers up.

Why do the work (= pay server bandwidth + maintenance) someone else (e.g. imageshack) can do for you, right?

Thanks for everything so far, and keep up the excellent work.

#264247 by unknown[382] at 2005-06-25 00:01:44 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

If it helps the site, I'm all for it.

too bad some really sweet avatars were lost..

#264283 by bloupx (First Line Support) at 2005-06-25 00:35:37 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

chris wrote:

Blank vote, as there wasn't an 'I don't care' option :smirk:

if you odn't care, why post at all.

#264290 by chrisDonor (Power User) at 2005-06-25 00:40:14 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

Just putting my opinion on the discussion topic, thats all.

#264345 by podgeyDonor (LFC Rule) at 2005-06-25 01:35:20 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

i think its good because it helps out the site, alls it takes is a few seconds changing your link in your profile and uploading the pic to imageshack or a similar site

#264365 by VgEe99Donor (User) at 2005-06-25 01:52:42 (8 years ago) - [Report]Top

i really wouldnt care
i use my own websapce.. and if its better for the site..
well hell delete the module!

1 2 3 4
<< Prev      Next >>

This topic is locked; no new posts are allowed.

Quick jump: